Peace Agreement Analysis
Nevertheless, the challenges in implementing the often ambitious provisions of a peace agreement are considerable: the expectations of the population for the immediate and tangible manifestation of peace are high; Creating new balances of power and unforeseen conflict challenges; and decisions taken in structured and restricted political negotiations are entrusted to the institutions and bodies that must be implemented under significant public control. Implementation begins at the negotiating table when the parties discuss how to ensure compliance with their commitments and remain years after a peace agreement is signed. Negotiators of a possible peace process in Afghanistan still have a long way to go to find substantial common ground, but it is possible to imagine compromises that could constitute a plausible agreement. Among the fundamental elements of a peace agreement that would probably be addressed by the parties: 55 Beyond that, the economic provisions will address the problem of the flap-joy. While it is important to be as complete as possible and to create a broad basis for peace, certain elements of each party will be excluded . The inclusion of economic provisions in peace agreements will enable the parties to understand how and by whom the economy is controlled. Failure to integrate the economy after conflict can leave tangible economic opportunities beyond the control of the parties. In this vacuum, spoilers establish control of economic opportunities and become influential. There is one reason why peace agreements are seen as so central to peacekeeping: they are often the instrument that paves the way for the deployment of a peacekeeping mission. Peace agreements can be invaluable instruments for peace operations to support the transformation of conflict. They can help all parties in signing the agreement or supporting the process to understand their respective roles and responsibilities. They can strengthen the legitimacy of the mission by ensuring that the mission`s work is linked to the vision of national interest groups and not just to the preferences of the international community.
They can lead the mission, the government and other stakeholders involved to better understand the goals they are trying to achieve together. Faced with this strategic priority, MINUSCA leaders decided to develop their political strategy based on an analysis of the sources of violence in the car. The mission asked who the culprits were, what their motivations were and what might influence their behaviour. The mission then developed a strategy that used the instruments and capabilities at its disposal to deter these actors from using force. This included supporting the African initiative, but also implementing a number of other measures to combat the main perpetrators of violence at the national level (for example. (b) lack of representation in the national security forces of the Central African Union) and at the local level (such as initiatives to reduce violence in the Community, mediation of local peace agreements and military engagement against armed actors who practice violence against civilians).